
Whether it be for leading nations, organisations, teams or even relationships, effective leadership is sought by all.
Of all the things that have changed over the last few centuries, and particularly the massive amount of change experienced during the last 100 years, the one constant that remains is the need for good leadership.
Whether it be for leading nations, organisations, teams or even relationships, effective leadership is sought by all.
Traditionally, the view of leadership was that there were leaders and followers – each with his or her assigned or expected role. This is probably still true today. However, there is a growing body of authors and researchers who suggest there might be a broader definition of leadership. Many would suggest for example, that within organisations, we are now at a time when all employees will have to take turns at leading, where they see the need to influence others in order to achieve their goals (see my previous article Leadership – Do We Know What It Is? 4 Pointers To Start You On The Road To Becoming A Leader http://www.nationallearninginstitute.com/index_files/OnlineEmployeeTrainingDevelopmentServices.htm).
Even in the wider community, the leadership of groups is not the old fashioned “follow me” type. Noted author Charles Handy (The Leader Of The Future 1996) first described this new type of leadership as “distributed leadership”.
Handy inadvertently got a look at what distributed leadership might look like when giving a presentation in the UK, Handy facetiously compared an English team to a rowing crew.
“Eight people going backward as fast as they can, without speaking to each other, steered by the one person who can’t row.”
An oarsman in the audience corrected him; “How do you think” he said, “that we could go backward so fast, without communicating, if we were not completely confident in each other’s competence, committed to the same goal, and determined to do our best to reach it? It’s the perfect description for a team”.
Handy had to agree that he was right, but then asked: “Who is the leader of this team?”
“Well”, he said, “that depends. In the race, on the job, it is the little person at the back of the boat, the one who can’t row, who is in charge. He, or often she, is the task leader. But there is also the stroke, who sets the pace and standard we all must follow. Off the river, however the leader is the captain of the boat. He or she is responsible for choosing the crew, for our discipline, and for the mood and motivation of the group, but on the river, the captain is just another member of the crew. Finally, there is the coach, who is responsible for our training and development. There is no doubt who is the leader when the coach is around. We don’t have any one leader,” he concluded, “nor do we give anyone that title. The role shifts around, depending on the stage we are at.”
What stage is your organisation, your team, your relationship at?
What stage are you at?
In my work as a consultant with many different and diverse organisations, groups, teams and cultures, I see three constant leadership issues emerging around this need for distributed leadership.
So, if you have the formal responsibility of leading a group or team, or you are a member who must take the leadership role from time to time, where does that leave you?
Here are some suggestions that I have found useful, whether you are in a formal leadership role or you just need to influence others …
If you have some things that you have found useful as a leader, I’d be pleased to hear about them – I’m always looking for new examples of effective distributed leadership.
© The National Learning Institute

New articles on leadership and management posted weekly. Opportunity to add your comments or to have a rant on Bob's Blog.